Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Sargus II Spinning?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
