Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Sargus II Spinning?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
