Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
