Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX
