Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX
