Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Both Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, maximum drag and durability. If you must choose between them, Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
