Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Both Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, maximum drag and durability. If you must choose between them, Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
