Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200
Conclusion
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 500 FI and Daiwa RX LT?
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
