Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m
Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) and total score (7.08 out of 10). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99cm / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- For 8 out of 10 (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Similar comparisons
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX