Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Mitchell MX2 Spinning and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (7,4kg / 16,31lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X
