Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.59 out of 10) and total score (6.77 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX
