Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 4kg / 8,82lbs and a durability of 8.59 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
