Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X and Daiwa TANACOM 800X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Daiwa TANACOM 800X stands out for a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa TANACOM?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa TANACOM 800X
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
