Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
Feeder And Match
51.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €30.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/230
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a maximum drag of 6,8kg / 14,99lbs, while Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF stands out for a gear ratio of 5.5:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- With 9 out of 10 score (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
