Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) and ball bearings (4). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
