Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and ball bearings (6). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
