Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
66.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight200g / 7.06oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €79.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,06oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX
