Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX
Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT
Spinning
82.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €143.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000S-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and ball bearings (5). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 23 LEXA LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX
Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Aero C5000X
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X
Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX
Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX