Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33858 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33858 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Delphin RAYA body


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Delphin RAYA body
