Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
Seafishing
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.88 out of 10
Ergonomics5.51 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R stands out for a gear ratio of 4.9:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
- With a high gear ratio of 9.4 out of 10 (4.9:1), this reel is built for jigging, lure work, or staying tight to fast-moving fish
- Scoring 8.21 out of 10 (625g / 22,05oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
- With a premium bearing count of 3 scoring 5 out of 10, our reel offers a high-end smoothness and durability, ready for all different environments
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-XHX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X
