Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.83 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €115.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa Freams LT 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a maximum drag of 6,8kg / 14,99lbs, while Daiwa Freams LT 3000X stands out for a ball bearings of 5. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa Freams LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Freams LT 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.5 out of 10 (225g / 7,94oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
