Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Delphin ELIXIR
Spinning
53.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.19 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight244g / 8.61oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/350
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Delphin ELIXIR 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a maximum drag of 6,8kg / 14,99lbs, while Delphin ELIXIR 3000X stands out for a ball bearings of 3+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Delphin ELIXIR?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin ELIXIR 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (244g / 8,61oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
