Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX
