Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.92 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight530g / 18.7oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €138.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 LW LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX stands out for a gear ratio of 4:9:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Penn Squall II Levelwind?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
- A gear ratio of 4:9:1 (scoring 6.11 out of 10) gives you a nice middle ground, just enough torque to handle pressure, but still quick enough for general use
- Scoring 8.23 out of 10 (530g / 18,7oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a retrieve score of 5.71 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
