Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (5+1) and the gear ratio (4.7). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano AERO XR?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
