Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). While Shimano Catana FE 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Catana FE?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX
