Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
51.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Shimano Catana FE 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Catana FE 2500X stands out for a ball bearings of 3+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Catana FE?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Delphin HORNET 50X
