Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). While Shimano Catana FE 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Catana FE?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.86 out of 10 (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX
