Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
