Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX edges out Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) and the durability (5.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing and a weight of 215g / 7.58oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI and Penn Slammer IV?
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7.58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.29 out of 10 (79cm / 31.10 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Delphin HORNET 40X
