Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.1:1) and ball bearings (6). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.57 out of 10 (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
