Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
Spinning
49.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.2/220. 0.25/140, 0.3/100
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Shimano Catana 3000 SRC, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). While Shimano Catana 3000 SRC may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Catana 3000 SRC?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8 out of 10 (300g / 10.58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (2 Shielded Stainless Steel + 1 Roller Bearing) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Similar comparisons
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin HORNET 40X
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 1500X
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 40X
Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX
Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX
Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX
Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX
Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X