Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano Sahara 4000 R
Spinning
42.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3 kg / 6.61 lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €50.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). While Shimano Sahara 4000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sahara 4000 R?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 4000 R
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
