Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX
