Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/257
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Delphin CarbonIX?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX
