Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Penn International VISW
Multireels
67.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.68 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1/1.4:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight1590g / 56.09oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €559.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/1270
Conclusion
Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX edges out Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (4.1:1/1.4:1) and the total score (6.76 out of 10). Still, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs and a ball bearings of 6, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Penn International VISW?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX
- A gear ratio of 4.1:1/1.4:1 (scoring 6.33 out of 10) gives you a nice middle ground, just enough torque to handle pressure, but still quick enough for general use
Similar comparisons

Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
