Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX edges out Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (265g / 9,35oz) and the gear ratio (5.0:1). Still, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch and a ball bearings of 6, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
