Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X

Penn Battle III
Spinning
74.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.20/220

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
61.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight860g / 30.34oz
Line retireve per crank131 centimeter / 51.57 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €959.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.62/400
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 2000X edges out Shimano 19 Stella 30000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano 19 Stella 30000X holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano 19 Stella?
Penn Battle III 2000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
