Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
74.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.20/220

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 2000X and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 2000X offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Penn Battle III 2000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X
