Penn Battle III 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
72.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.73 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 3000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 520g / 18,34oz and a ergonomics of 5.93 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Penn Battle III 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Delphin FRIZ


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
