Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 6000X and Daiwa TANACOM 800X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 6000X offers a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch, while Daiwa TANACOM 800X stands out for a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa TANACOM?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A high retrieve rate of 9.9 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa BG 2000X
