Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
74.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight615g / 21.69oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/230
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 6000X and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 6000X offers a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch, while Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX stands out for a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A high retrieve rate of 9.9 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC
