Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
