Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and the weight (230g / 8,11oz). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.5 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX
