Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32283 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €70.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Battle III 8000 HSX and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX offers a durability of 8.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32283 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32283 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
