Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
51.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX edges out Shimano Catana FE 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs). Still, Shimano Catana FE 2500X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 260g / 9,17oz and a line retrieve per crank of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano Catana FE?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 2500X
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X
