Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and the weight (220g / 7,76oz). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Delphin YUPIE


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX
