Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
67.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H
Multireels
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.83 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag-
Weight585 g
Line retireve per crank120 cm / 27.24 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil360m/0.30mm
Conclusion
Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H edges out Penn FIERCE IV 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.83 out of 10). Still, Penn FIERCE IV 2000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a maximum drag of 4,5kg / 9,92lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H?
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
