Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
69.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €435.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/190
Conclusion
Both Penn FIERCE IV 2500X and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn FIERCE IV 2500X offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano TLD 25X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X
