Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX, offering significantly better performance in weight (160g / 5,64oz) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn International VISW and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
- A 7 out of 10 (5) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
