Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350
Conclusion
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Sargus II Spinning and Delphin BRONZ?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 300 4000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X
