Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX offers a durability of 5.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- Rated 8.51 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
