Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
4000-c (match And Feeder)x
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.95 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €47.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C (Match and Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX offers a durability of 5.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
- Rated 8.37 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
