Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX clearly outshines Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and weight (215g / 7,58oz). While Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Slammer IV and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
